OUTDOOR
PURSUITS
with Rob Miskosky
The Great De-Bait, Part
II
The review jumped out at
me almost immediately.
The title alone peaked
my interest but the
summary stole my
attention and had me
fully immersed in the 68
page document within
minutes.
Prepared by the Canadian
Cooperative Wildlife
Health Centre,
Department of Veterinary
Pathology at the
University of
Saskatchewan, the
document was written
because “The
contracting agencies,
Parks Canada and
Saskatchewan
Environment, recognize
that an objective review
of existing literature
may help to answer
questions and concerns
within and outside the
agencies, and help to
guide subsequent
decision-making
concerning management
and research pertaining
to feeding and baiting.”
Titled “A Comprehensive
Review of the Ecological
and Human Social Effects
of Artificial Feeding
and Baiting of Wildlife”
by Linda Dunkley and
Mark Cattet, the review
quickly jumped on the
spread of disease as
being the most immediate
concern for the
contracting agencies,
Parks Canada and
Saskatchewan
Environment. While the
document provided for
little good regarding
the baiting of deer, it
must have fallen on deaf
ears. Prepared in 2003,
to this day the practice
of baiting deer in
Saskatchewan is alive
and well, especially in
outfiitted hunting
circles.
|
 |
|
Deer on a
bait pile in
northwestern
Saskatchewan. |
During the week I spent
this past hunting season
in Saskatchewan, at just
about every turn was a
bait site. The pick-up
truck hauling a trailer
full of alfalfa bales
at dark into the
forested Meadow Lake
Provincial Park proved
that the practice of
baiting was full-steam
ahead.
Being naive as to the
enormity of the baiting
taking place, I was
astonished to learn that
the outfitter in the
area we were hunting had
amassed a collection of
40 different bait sites
over several miles of
Crown land, virtually
locking everybody,
including residents, out
of the area.
The outfitter was also
very protective of the
area he had sewn up, and
in fact had local fish
and wildlife officers
visit two of our
locations requesting us
to move. His reasoning:
We were too close to his
bait sites. Given the
circumstances, anybody
within 10 miles in any
given direction would
have been too close to
his bait sites—they were
everywhere. Did we have
to move? Yes we did. The
officers’ reasoning: He
had to live with the
outfitter, not us.
Apparently Saskatchewan
outfitters have a lot of
pull with Saskatchewan
Environment.
It was recently shown
that chronic wasting
disease (CWD) can be
spread from one animal
to another through
saliva. Urine and feces
are also suspected but
have yet to be shown as
a means of transmission.
But what we know more
than anything else is
that the disease spreads
rapidly—and not just CWD,
but also bovine
tuberculosis and
others—when animals
become congregated, such
as they are on game
farms and at feeding
stations and bait sites.
|
 |
|
Bait can be
purchased
from any
feed store
at low cost. |
Considering Alberta’s
CWD woes in wild deer
just so happen to exist
within that part of the
province nearest
Saskatchewan, Alberta’s
attempts to eradicate
the disease with its CWD
Cull Program may be at
best a waste of taxpayer
dollars and enforcement
time as long as baiting
continues in
Saskatchewan. Deer do
not recognize provincial
boundaries and as such,
a deer residing on a
bait site in
Saskatchewan is just as
likely to cross into
Alberta at any given
time, and more than
likely already has.
Ken McDaid of the Fair
Chase League, a farmer
and resident of
Saskatchewan, has been
trying to stop baiting
in that province for
many years. A hunter
himself, McDaid is
horrified by the baiting
practice and tells
anybody who will listen
about his fears. But so
far, nobody is
listening.
“I’ve been banging my
head against the wall
for a long time now,”
said McDaid, clearly
frustrated at the lack
of progress his group
has made with
Saskatchewan
Environment.
“Why in the world they
don’t stop this... I
don’t know. They keep
telling us there is no
evidence to show baiting
can cause the spread of
disease. But everybody
knows it, they know it.
They aren’t looking down
the road.”
In 1994, Ken McDaid, two
former ministers of
Saskatchewan Environment
and several others
formed the Fair Chase
League. Their sole
purpose is to put an end
to the practice of
baiting deer. While some
of the original members
of the Fair Chase League
are no longer with us,
others have taken their
place and their
commitment is steadfast.
But their battle keeps
running into a brick
wall, namely
Saskatchewan
Environment.
|
 |
|
A Wisconsin
conservation
officer
behind a
huge,
illegal pile
of corn used
for baiting
deer.
- photo
Wisconsin
Deer Hunters
Association. |
“Manitoba quit baiting
and game farming a few
years ago. But what is
the point of them
(Manitoba) doing all
that if we
(Saskatchewan) keep
doing it. And you guys
in Alberta don’t allow
baiting, but here we are
baiting away. It’s
frustrating. Whatever
happened to the
precautionary
principal?”
McDaid also believes
that Saskatchewan’s
outfitting industry has
a much larger say in the
matter than they should.
And can’t believe they
can’t agree that baiting
is bad for the health of
the deer herd. A herd
that they themselves
should be most concerned
about.
“The outfitters don’t
want to lose the bait.
It’s all economics.
They’re worried it will
cost them a lot of
money. They can run one
or two guides to pick up
their clients, drop them
in a treestand in front
of a pile of bait and
leave. If they had to go
one-on-one, they’d have
to hire more guides.
They don’t want to do
it. They can’t see past
the end of their noses.”
In Alberta baiting deer
for the purpose of
hunting has long been
illegal. And according
to Provincial Wildlife
Disease Specialist,
Margo Pybus, justifiably
so.
“We know that if you get
a congregation of deer
the chance of disease
spreading horizontally
goes up. There’s no
denying it.”
It is also known that
former SRD minister,
David Coutts, had
arranged a meeting with
Saskatchewan Environment
minister, John Nilson,
to discuss several
issues with baiting and
CWD being one of them.
Poor weather, however,
curtailed a flight and
the meeting was
postponed. At this stage
it is hoped that our new
minister, Ted Morton,
will pick up the ball
and run with it, perhaps
bringing to light an
issue that doesn’t sit
well with Saskatchewan’s
neighbours.
But until, or if that
happens, the questions
remain, why does
Saskatchewan continue to
allow baiting when the
provinces on both sides
of her do not? And are
we in Alberta and
Manitoba paying to try
and eliminate a problem
that Saskatchewan
refuses to acknowledge
may in fact be helped
along by some of the
practices legally taking
place in that province?
And why does
Saskatchewan continue to
allow baiting when the
Expert Scientific Panel
on Chronic Wasting
Disease recommends a ban
on baiting and
artificial feeding?
In order to try and get
an answer to that
question, I contacted
Saskatchewan
Environment.
Unfortunately, nobody
could give me an answer.
The last response I got,
from Information
Officer, Zamira
Vicenzino Heth, was that
she would find somebody
who could answer my
question and get back to
me right away. I’m still
waiting.
|
 |
Bait site
set up close
to the
boundary of
Riding
Mountain
National
Park in
Manitoba
when baiting
in that
province was
legal,
except in
the Park.
The same
could be
applied in
Saskatchewan
with the
Park
Boundary
becoming the
Alberta
border.
- photo
Roger
Turenne,
CPAWS |
Mark Cattet, the man who
in part was commissioned
by Parks Canada and
Saskatchewan Environment
back in 2003 to provide
the review of feeding
and baiting practices,
and who is also a Doctor
of Veterinary Medicine,
agrees with Margo.
“In general, if you’ve
got diseases known to
possibly be transmitted
by saliva or what have
you, and you’ve got a
high concentration of
animals, it’s a
no-brainer. You can
explain it to primary
children and they will
understand it. If you do
this, you get this.
“I certainly didn’t
expect the review to be
received as a
revelation. The
information is out
there. All I did was put
it into context so it
was easy to understand
and readily available.”
But Cattet’s review,
which you can read at
http://wildlife1.usask.ca/wildlife_health_topics/wildlife_baiting.pdf,
goes beyond explaining
the consequences related
to disease. He also
suggests that feeding
and baiting causes “Disruption
of animal movement
patterns and spatial
distribution, alteration
of community structure
with reduced diversity
and abundance, the
introduction and
invasion of exotic plant
species, and general
degradation of habitat
are all major negative
effects that have been
documented at different
locations throughout
North America.”
The underlying culprit
in Saskatchewan’s
refusal to ban baiting
practices most certainly
lies at the political
level. The science is
there and has been for
years. But politicians
generally don’t look at
what is right, but
rather at what it will
cost them in votes.
Baiting has become a
huge money-maker for not
only Saskatchewan’s
outfitted hunting
industry, but also for
agriculture and others
who make money from
hunting activities. A
lot of alfalfa and other
cereal grains are
purchased and used in
baiting. This has also
proven to be the case in
several states where the
mention of a bait ban
has brought uproar.
Banning a hunter’s
ability to bait, also
removes somebody else’s
ability to provide the
goods needed for
baiting.
But CWD is a dangerous
game. And one that
rolling the dice on will
invariably lead to a
losing hand.
For previous Outdoor
Pursuits
click here. |